« Featured on MVP Award Program Blog - Alex Pearce's SharePoint Blog | Home | Why I am not a Wittgensteinian »

Sixty-Seconds — Really?

By admin | January 1, 1970

Recently, we had a couple of Program Directors — the gate keepers of the public radio airwaves — listen to some episodes of Philosophy Talk and tell us what they liked and didn’t like. We won’t bore you with the details, but just to give you a feel for what we’re up against with these folks, we thought we’d share a few comments they made about Ian Shoales, the sixty-second philosopher.
One PD says the following:
If he was the 60 Second Philosopher, his segment was 2:20. That in and of itself is a problem.
Another says:
− The 60- Second Philosopher lasted 2.5 minutes … they lied to me. I thought, ‘They said all of that in 60 seconds?’
Still another says:
• 60 – second – A good element, because it introduces another voice, another point of view. … I […]

Original post by Philosophy Talk

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • BlogMemes Cn
  • Blue Dot
  • Book.mark.hu
  • Bumpzee
  • co.mments
  • feedmelinks
  • Fleck
  • Furl
  • Gwar
  • Internetmedia
  • kick.ie
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Linkter
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • ppnow
  • RawSugar
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Smarking
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Webride
  • Wykop

Topics: Uncategorized |

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Feed

About Me

Put something about you here by editing the right sidebar.

Blogroll

Search